Answers to Frequently Asked Questions
regarding
ALABAMA’S NEW REGULATION
ENFORCING THE
PRIVACY
OF NONPUBLIC PERSONAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Alabama Insurance Regulation, Chapter 482-1-122
Alabama Department of Insurance
Legal Division
Post Office Box 303351
Montgomery, Alabama 36130-3351
Telephone: (334) 241-4116
Facsimile: (334) 241-4192
Internet: www.aldoi.org
QUESTIONS ON PRIVACY REGULATION
With some limited exceptions, all companies, agents and other
persons and entities licensed under Alabama insurance law. All licensees,
including health insurers and HMOs, are considered "financial institutions"
under Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 6801-6827)
("GLBA").
Yes. All entities licensed under the insurance law are required
to comply with the regulation.
Yes, the regulation applies to surplus line brokers. However,
you are not required to comply with the financial information notice and
opt out provisions if you do not disclose any nonpublic personal information
for any purpose including joint marketing and servicing, (except when the
information is disclosed pursuant to the specific business and legal exceptions
provided); and you deliver a notice to your consumers and customers stating
that fact.
Yes, see the "Questions for Agents" section for detailed information
regarding the regulation’s applicability to producers.
All entities that are licensed under the applicable state insurance
law are required to comply with the regulation, which would include licensed
MGAs. Since Alabama does not license TPA’s, the notice requirements do
not apply to a TPA; however, the law and regulation indirectly applies
to a TPA since it would be applicable to the insurer
No, workers’ compensation plans are not subject to the Insurance
Commissioner’s regulation, although they are presumable subject to the
Federal law.
NOTE: Even under the NAIC model regulation, a workers’ compensation plan is only required to provide privacy and opt out notices to a person who receives benefits from the plan (a "beneficiary") if the plan wishes to disclose the beneficiary’s nonpublic personal financial information to a third party outside the extensive exceptions provided in the regulation. In such a situation (under the NAIC model regulation), the beneficiary is the plan’s "consumer." Workers’ compensation plans are also required (under the NAIC model regulation) to provide annual privacy notices to all plan participants (employers).
A claimant under any insurance policy is considered a consumer
under the regulation if the insurer discloses nonpublic personal financial
information about the claimant to a nonaffiliated third party outside the
exceptions provided in the regulation. As a consumer, such a claimant is
entitled to a privacy notice and the opportunity to opt out of the disclosure
of nonpublic personal financial information.
If you do not share nonpublic personal information about a claimant,
or if you share such information pursuant to the exceptions in the Regulation,
you have no obligation to the claimant.
If you do not share nonpublic personal information about a beneficiary,
or if you share such information pursuant to the exceptions in the Regulation,
you have no obligation to the beneficiary.
Beneficiaries and claimants that submit a claim under a policy
choosing a settlement option involving an on-going relationship with an
insurer are considered consumers, not customers. Thus, the company will
be required to provide the individuals with privacy notices and an opportunity
to opt out if the company wishes to disclose the individual’s nonpublic
personal information to third parties. There are no on-going privacy policy
notice requirements.
The regulation was effective July 1, 2001, but compliance is
not required until December 31, 2001.
The GLBA became effective November 13, 2000. Alabama extended
the compliance date to July 1, 2001, and then to December 31, 2001. In
general notices should have been sent out with renewals or other mailings
to comply with these dates. However, as long as there appears to be intent
to timely comply, and information has not been shared except when pursuant
to one or more of the exceptions set out in the regulation, no enforcement
action would be initiated.
Alabama did not adopt the portion of the NAIC model regulation
relating to health information. Additionally, the Alabama regulation does
not apply to entities that will become subject to the HHS regulations under
HIPAA if the licensee: (1) does not obtain information about the income
or assets of the consumer or customer, (2) does not disclose to a nonaffiliated
third party nonpublic financial information other than as permitted under
the regulation, and (3) the licensee’s activities regarding the policies
or benefits is subject to the HHS regulations when they become effective.
No. The exception mentioned above is only applicable if you are
subject to the HHS regulation.
Insurers are required to provide their customers with annual
privacy notices. "Customers" are individuals with whom you have on-going
relationships. Policyholders are customers, for example. In contrast, applicants
are consumers and are only entitled to privacy notices if you wish to share
their protected financial information with third parties. Similarly, beneficiaries
and claimants are only entitled to receive privacy notices if you wish
to disclose their protected information to third parties.
The federal law becomes effective July 1, 2001, but the Alabama
regulation does not require compliance until December 31, 2001. If you
have not sent privacy notices to all your customers by December
1, 2001, you will be in violation of the regulation.
You are not required to give a privacy notice to a consumer unless
you wish to disclose nonpublic personal financial information regarding
that consumer to a nonaffiliated third party. So, if you do not give the
consumer a notice and do not disclose his or her information to a third
party, there is no problem. If, however, you do not give the consumer a
notice and you do disclose his or her information to a third party, you
would be in violation of the regulation and subject to applicable enforcement
actions.
Privacy, opt out and opt in notices can be sent together or separately,
and they can be sent with other customer mailings. In addition, affiliated
companies may send notices together, or they can send combined notices.
No matter how they are sent, however, all notices must identify the companies
and policies to which they apply. They must be accurate, and they must
be clear and conspicuous so that the customer can read and understand them.
Yes. A company can share nonpublic personal information with
service providers for a variety of purposes regardless of whether a consumer
permits disclosure of his or her information.
No, the employee is not in violation of the regulation simply
by virtue of his or her employment status and knowledge of information.
However, the employee (and thus the insurer) would be in violation if the
employee uses the protected information of Company A’s customer on behalf
of Company B, C or D outside one of the exceptions to the general rule.
In that way, the employee would be "disclosing" the information to the
other company.
Yes. If your company discloses the information pursuant to one
of the exceptions in the regulation, the affiliated company to which the
information is disclosed may use the information for the purposes authorized
pursuant to the exceptions.
No, but the third party’s use and disclosure of that information
is limited.
If your company receives nonpublic personal financial information
from a nonaffiliated financial institution, your use and disclosure of
that information is limited as follows:
a) you may disclose the information to the original financial institution’s affiliates;
b) you may disclose the information to your affiliates, but they, in turn, may only disclosure the information to the extent you may disclose the information;
c) if you received the information pursuant to one of the exceptions in the regulation, you may use and disclose the information pursuant to an exception in the ordinary course of business to carry out the activity covered by the exception under which you received the information; and
d) if you received the information outside an exception, you may disclose the information to any other person if the original financial institution could lawfully disclose the information to that person.
When you receive information from another financial institution,
such as a bank or securities firm, that information may be subject to the
regulations that govern the institution. The Federal Reserve Board, the
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Federal Trade Commission
are just three of the several federal government agencies that have promulgated
privacy regulations for financial institutions under GLBA. All of the federal
regulations contain provisions restricting the reuse and re-disclosure
of protected information by parties that receive information from financial
institutions. These provisions are identical in all material respects to
the reuse and re-disclosure provisions in the regulation. Generally, they
permit you to disclose protected information received from another financial
institution only to the extent the original financial institution could
disclose the information. (See question 24 for further details.) Note that
receipt of such information could also give rise to obligations under the
insurance privacy regulation if the information involves one of your consumers
or customers.
These two issues are not related. The fact that an individual
has "opted out" of disclosure will have no impact on your company’s ability
to handle claims or do any other business activity related to servicing
or processing a particular product or service. The extensive business exceptions
to the rule ensure that companies can continue these standard business
operations without interruption. Because your company will be able to process
claims, the discrimination issue will never arise.
No, premium rates cannot be based on an individual’s choice to
prohibit or allow the sharing of his or her information. However, this
does not prevent a company from offering discounts for other reasons.
By its nature, insurance treats people differently depending
on their circumstances. For example, life insurance premium rates may differ
depending on age, health, and gender. Homeowner’s insurance rates may differ
depending on the value and location of the home. An individual’s choice
to protect his or her personal information, however, is not a legitimate
factor in determining an appropriate underwriting rate. People should not
feel pressured to "sell" their private information in order to get cheaper
insurance. Note that the non-discrimination provision of the regulation
prohibits "unfair discrimination." Although insurers cannot discriminate
against consumers and customers for prohibiting the disclosure of their
personal information by raising rates or dropping coverage, insurers don’t
have to offer them the special offers that are available to consumers and
customers who permit their personal information to be disclosed.
AGENT ISSUES
Yes, the regulation does apply to agents. However, an agent does
not have to comply with the notice and opt out requirements of the regulation
if:
a) the agent is an employee, agent or other representative of another licensee (a "principal" or "company") that complies with, and provides the notices required by, the regulation; and
b) the agent does not disclose protected information to any person other than the principal or its affiliates.
To clarify, if an agent wishes to disclose a consumer’s protected information to an entity other than the insurance company or insurance companies that the agent is representing, the agent must give the consumer a copy of the agent’s privacy notice and an opportunity to prohibit the disclosure of that information to non-affiliated third parties ("opt out").
You are subject to the regulation, but you are not required to
comply with the notice and opt out requirements of the regulation if:
a) the company for which you act as an agent complies with the regulation; and
b)you do not disclose protected information to any person other than that company or its affiliates.
Just like other agents, you are subject to the regulation, but
you are not required to comply with the notice and opt out requirements
of the regulation if:
a) the company (or companies) for which you are acting as an agent with respect to a particular consumer complies with the regulation; and
b) you do not disclose protected information to any person other than that company (or companies) or the affiliates of that company (or companies).
Yes, you are subject to the regulation. However, just like other
agents, you are not required to comply with the notice and opt out requirements
of the regulation if:
a) the company (or companies) for which you are acting as an agent with respect to a particular consumer complies with the regulation; and
b)you do not disclose protected information to any person other than that company (or companies) or the affiliates of that company (or companies).
Yes, an agent may share protected information with multiple companies
in an effort to compare prices. In such situations, the individual will
be a consumer of each of the companies and will be entitled to privacy
and opt out notices from any of the companies that wishes to share the
individual’s protected financial information with non-affiliated third
parties. The individual’s consent will be required prior to disclosure
of protected health information. Note that these individuals may become
your consumers – or customers – if you disclose their protected
information (for other than normal business purposes outlined in the exceptions
in the rule). (See Question 29.)
Not necessarily. You are required to provide privacy and opt
out notices and opt out opportunities to a client if the client is your
"customer." A client is considered your customer if he or she obtains financial,
investment or economic advisory services relating to an insurance product
or service from you for a fee, or if the individual obtains insurance through
you. If you are acting as agent for another licensee (a "principal"
or "company"), however, you are not required to provide privacy notices
to your customer if:
a) the principal or company complies with the regulation with respect to that customer; and
b) you do not disclose protected information about that customer to any person other than the principal or company or its affiliates.
If you are required to send privacy and opt out notices to existing clients, they must be sent by December 31, 2001, which is the compliance date set forth in the regulation.
Like all aspects of the agent-principal relationship, effective
compliance with privacy regulations will require on-going communication
and coordination between the parties. See the next question for additional
clarification.
Specific compliance issues will be decided on a case-by-case
basis, of course. However, if an agent is acting in good faith and legitimately
relies on a company to comply with the regulation, the agent would have
a good argument that he or she should not be held responsible.
Not necessarily. If these individuals are simply requesting information
and not purchasing a product, they are likely to be considered consumers
– either your consumers or consumers of the companies for which you are
acting as agent. If you collect protected personal information about these
individuals and you are going to share that information with non-affiliated
third parties, you will be required to provide them privacy and opt out
notices prior to disclosure of any protected personal information. On the
other hand, if you are not going to disclose any non-public personal information
to non-affiliated third parties, you have no obligations to provide privacy
and opt out notices to the individual. Finally, if you are going to disclose
information only pursuant to a joint marketing or servicing agreement,
a privacy notice is all that is required; the consumer is not entitled
to opt out. If an individual actually purchases a product from you over
the telephone, that individual is considered a customer. Normally, customers
are entitled to privacy and opt out notices at the time the customer relationship
is established. With a telephone transaction, however, delivery of notices
can be delayed with the customer’s consent. The same obligations would
apply to the companies for which you are acting as agent.